Yes, the rank method, which was developed for the purposes of
plotting the parcellation as an overlay, had a flaw when used for
comparisons across subjects: if subjects were missing different
ROIs, then the ranking would subsequently assign different values
to higher-valued ROIs. That method has been replaced be a
fixed-value reordering. Please see this thread https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/community/board/read.php?1,153419,153419#msg-153419 .
It should list all the regions they could possibly have. In reality, it seems a much shorter list actually gets returned by either the aparc+aseg or aparc+aseg2009 parcellations. I have tried to make a list of these and classify them by approx. tissue type (NB: the FS people gave me a list of some of what they consider ventricles and CSF, but there were a couple things that they hadn’t included as non-GM which I really think should be; they neither confirmed nor denied these regions, so please interpret as you please). The lists used by AFNI in the “REN” volumes can be found in the source code. For example, they could be listed by doing the following in a terminal (that is in tcsh):
set locafni = `which afni`
set dirafni = `dirname $locafni`
ls $dirafni/afni_fs*txt
–pt
The
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is part of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.