Thus obtaining in the output bucket: Full_Fstat, _Tstat, _Coeff and _Fstat for each stim_lab.
We’d like to perform a second level group analysis using 3dttest. Which of the contents of the bucket we have to use? Which sub-brick of the statistical bucket dataset contains the contrast file for the t statistic and f statistic (thus for F the extra sum of squares)? Do we have to produce additional output using -gltsym?

of course we’ve tried to use the effect estimates, thus (let be C1 Coeff of the hrf term, C2 and C3 coeffs for 1st and 2nd derivative) we produced 1/3(C1+C2+C3) and tested it at the second level. However, we wonder whether is it more correct to bring to the second level the results of an F test. What do you think?

I’m not so sure why you modeled the hemodynamic response with ‘SIN(0,20,10)’. It seems to me that ‘BLOCK(30,1)’ would make more sense to me.

we wonder whether is it more correct to bring to the second level the results of an F test. What do you think?

No, the F-stat shows the significance for a specific null hypothesis for each subject, and would not be a reasonable candidate for group analysis. You want to make some statistical inference based on the physical measurement or effect estimate.

The
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is part of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.