I am new to using ETAC in 3dttest++ and I have a question about the hpow value. In a dataset I’m currently analyzing, when hpow is set to 0, I get cluster activity that makes sense and is in line with what -Clustsim in 3dttest++ gives me, but when hpow is set to 1 or 2, no voxels pass the correction. Could someone help me to wrap my head around what that means? I’ve pasted my full 3dttest++ command below and I’d appreciate any insight into how to interpret this.
I’m sorry for the double post. I just noticed a mistake I was making, but I’m still a bit confused. My 3dttest++ command above should have been the version I’ve pasted below. When I fixed this, I now have no voxels that pass the correction for hpow=0, hpow=1, or hpow=2 when tested separately. However, when I run -ETAC_opt NN=2:sid=2:hpow=0,1,2:pthr=0.01/0.001/19:name=all:fpr=5 I get clusters that pass the correction. The help page says there is little reason for including all three hpows in a single call. Could you please explain that more? Thanks again and I’m sorry for the confusion!
I never received a response to this question and I’m still really confused about how to interpret the results. When I use a single hpow value in ETAC (0,1, or 2) for some contrasts, I do not get any significant clusters. However, when I use a combination of hpow values as in the command below, I do get significant voxels.
I’ve read the Etac paper and I can’t wrap my head around why adding more comparisons (additional hpow values) would make some voxels pass the test when there were none that passed the test with a single hpow. I would greatly appreciate any help!
The
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is part of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.