I have two questions regarding the new (11/2016) installation of 3dClustSim.
Can the -ACF option be used with small volumes? i.e. are there any issues in using -ACF and -oksmallmask together?
We are interested in running 3dClustSim and 3dFWHMx in two ROIs- the bilateral amygdala and the vmPFC. Can all three (counting left and right amygdala as separate ROIs) be run in the same 3dClustSim command? Or does this lead to miscalculations of smoothness and cluster size? If there is an issue, would it still be present if only running the left and right amygdala (excluding vmPFC)? Essentially we’re wondering if issues are produced if you have discontiguous ROI masks.
Can the -ACF option be used with small volumes? i.e. are there any issues in using -ACF and -oksmallmask together?
3dClustSim -ACF should be fine with a small mask as long as you can justify the small volume correction approach.
We are interested in running 3dClustSim and 3dFWHMx in two ROIs- the bilateral amygdala and the vmPFC.
Can all three (counting left and right amygdala as separate ROIs) be run in the same 3dClustSim command? Or
does this lead to miscalculations of smoothness and cluster size? If there is an issue, would it still be present if
only running the left and right amygdala (excluding vmPFC)? Essentially we’re wondering if issues are produced
if you have discontiguous ROI masks.
To avoid any potential issues, you can estimate the ACF values based on the whole brain instead of those few small regions.
Thank you very much for your answers. The ROIs are chosen a priori based on prior literature and our hypotheses so I believe it should be ok to utilize them for small volume ROI analyses. And I will look into the new 3dttest++ -Clustsim option thank you!
The
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is part of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.